Intrauterine Device Perforation

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorQuevedo, Marjorie
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-10T19:02:50Z
dc.date.available2021-10-10T19:02:50Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractIntrauterine devices (IUDs) have had a controversial history but are regarded as a safe, effective form of contraception for all women. IUDs have many benefits, but at the same time, risks and complications may occur in a small percentage of women. The case study first resents a patient with an IUD that perforated the uterus and then offers a discussion of the risks and benefits of IUD contraception.en_US
dc.identifier.citationQuevedo, M. (2016). Intrauterine device perforation. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 32(4), 207-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756479316645538en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/8756479316645538
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12521/249
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleIntrauterine Device Perforationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Collections

Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles